Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite are both current production-tier models. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is meaningfully cheaper at $0.25 / $1.5 per 1M. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has a 1M context window — about 5× the 200k of Claude Haiku 4.5. Claude Haiku 4.5 leads on coding, reasoning, general knowledge. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads on long-context retrieval, multilingual.

Specs side by side

Metric
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Input price (per 1M)$1$0.25
Output price (per 1M)$5$1.5
Context window200k tokens1M tokens
Speed tierfastultra
Open weightsNoNo
EU regionYesYes
Free tierNoGoogle AI Studio
Prompt cachingYesNo
Vision inputYesYes
Extended thinkingNoNo

When to choose each

Anthropic

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if…

  • HIPAA eligibility is required
  • Coding is central to your workload
  • Reasoning is central to your workload
Google Free tier

Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite if…

  • Cost is a priority ($0.25 / $1.5 per 1M vs $1 / $5 per 1M)
  • You need 1M context (5× more than Claude Haiku 4.5)
  • You want a free tier for prototyping
  • Long-context retrieval is central to your workload
  • Multilingual is central to your workload

Benchmark delta

Claude Haiku 4.5 leads on

  • Coding
  • Reasoning
  • General knowledge
  • Instruction following
  • Tool use

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads on

  • Long-context retrieval
  • Multilingual

FAQ — Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite — which is better?

Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite are both current production-tier models. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is meaningfully cheaper at $0.25 / $1.5 per 1M. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has a 1M context window — about 5× the 200k of Claude Haiku 4.5. Claude Haiku 4.5 leads on coding, reasoning, general knowledge. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads on long-context retrieval, multilingual. The right pick depends on your use case — see "When to choose each" above for a data-driven decision.

How does Claude Haiku 4.5 pricing compare to Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1 / $5 per 1M vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite at $0.25 / $1.5 per 1M. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is cheaper on output tokens by roughly 233%. Both support prompt caching, which reduces effective cost by 80-90% on repeat system prompts.

Does Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite have the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has a 1M-token context window — 5× the 200k context of Claude Haiku 4.5. Enough for entire codebases, books, or multi-document RAG.

Is there a free tier for Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?

Claude Haiku 4.5: no — No free API tier; new accounts get starter credits. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: yes — Reduced daily quota; most generous free tier of any frontier lab.

Which is better for coding — Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?

Claude Haiku 4.5 leads on coding benchmarks (Claude Haiku 4.5: 82/100, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 72/100). For production coding agents also weigh tool-use performance — Claude Haiku 4.5 scores 88, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite scores 76.