Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.5 Flash are both current production-tier models. Gemini 3.5 Flash is meaningfully cheaper at $1.5 / $9 per 1M. Claude Opus 4.7 leads on coding, reasoning, general knowledge.

Specs side by side

Metric
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Input price (per 1M)$5$1.5
Output price (per 1M)$25$9
Context window1M tokens1.0M tokens
Speed tierslowfast
Open weightsNoNo
EU regionYesYes
Free tierNoGoogle AI Studio
Prompt cachingYesYes
Vision inputYesYes
Extended thinkingYesYes

When to choose each

Anthropic

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if…

  • Coding is central to your workload
  • Reasoning is central to your workload
Google Free tier

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash if…

  • Cost is a priority ($1.5 / $9 per 1M vs $5 / $25 per 1M)
  • Low latency matters (fast vs slow)
  • You want a free tier for prototyping

Benchmark delta

Claude Opus 4.7 leads on

  • Coding
  • Reasoning
  • General knowledge
  • Tool use

Gemini 3.5 Flash leads on

Gemini 3.5 Flash has no meaningful benchmark lead in this pair.

FAQ — Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash — which is better?

Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.5 Flash are both current production-tier models. Gemini 3.5 Flash is meaningfully cheaper at $1.5 / $9 per 1M. Claude Opus 4.7 leads on coding, reasoning, general knowledge. The right pick depends on your use case — see "When to choose each" above for a data-driven decision.

How does Claude Opus 4.7 pricing compare to Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5 / $25 per 1M vs Gemini 3.5 Flash at $1.5 / $9 per 1M. Gemini 3.5 Flash is cheaper on output tokens by roughly 178%. Both support prompt caching, which reduces effective cost by 80-90% on repeat system prompts.

Does Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 3.5 Flash have the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash has a 1.0M-token context window — 1× the 1M context of Claude Opus 4.7. Enough for entire codebases, books, or multi-document RAG.

Is there a free tier for Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Claude Opus 4.7: no — Free via Claude.ai web chat; API requires paid credits. Gemini 3.5 Flash: yes — Reduced daily quota via AI Studio for prototyping.

Which is better for coding — Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Claude Opus 4.7 leads on coding benchmarks (Claude Opus 4.7: 97/100, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 91/100). For production coding agents also weigh tool-use performance — Claude Opus 4.7 scores 96, Gemini 3.5 Flash scores 90.