Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Grok 4.20
Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Grok 4.20 are both current production-tier models. Grok 4.20 is meaningfully cheaper at $2 / $6 per 1M. Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads on tool use.
Specs side by side
| Metric | Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 | xAI Grok 4.20 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price (per 1M) | $3 | $2 |
| Output price (per 1M) | $15 | $6 |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 2M tokens |
| Speed tier | balanced | balanced |
| Open weights | No | No |
| EU region | Yes | No |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Prompt caching | Yes | Yes |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Extended thinking | Yes | Yes |
When to choose each
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 if…
- EU data residency is required
- HIPAA eligibility is required
- Tool use is central to your workload
Choose Grok 4.20 if…
- Cost is a priority ($2 / $6 per 1M vs $3 / $15 per 1M)
- You need 2M context (2× more than Claude Sonnet 4.6)
Benchmark delta
Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads on
- Tool use
Grok 4.20 leads on
Grok 4.20 has no meaningful benchmark lead in this pair.
FAQ — Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Grok 4.20
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Grok 4.20 — which is better?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Grok 4.20 are both current production-tier models. Grok 4.20 is meaningfully cheaper at $2 / $6 per 1M. Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads on tool use. The right pick depends on your use case — see "When to choose each" above for a data-driven decision.
How does Claude Sonnet 4.6 pricing compare to Grok 4.20?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3 / $15 per 1M vs Grok 4.20 at $2 / $6 per 1M. Grok 4.20 is cheaper on output tokens by roughly 150%. Both support prompt caching, which reduces effective cost by 80-90% on repeat system prompts.
Does Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Grok 4.20 have the bigger context window?
Grok 4.20 has a 2M-token context window — 2× the 1M context of Claude Sonnet 4.6. Enough for entire codebases, books, or multi-document RAG.
Is there a free tier for Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Grok 4.20?
Claude Sonnet 4.6: no — Free via Claude.ai web chat; API requires paid credits. Grok 4.20: no — X Premium includes Grok web chat; API is paid.
Which is better for coding — Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Grok 4.20?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads on coding benchmarks (Claude Sonnet 4.6: 94/100, Grok 4.20: 91/100). For production coding agents also weigh tool-use performance — Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 96, Grok 4.20 scores 88.