Codestral 25.08 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Codestral 25.08 and Gemini 3.1 Pro are both current production-tier models. Codestral 25.08 is meaningfully cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per 1M. Gemini 3.1 Pro has a 2M context window — about 8× the 256k of Codestral 25.08. Gemini 3.1 Pro leads on coding, reasoning, general knowledge.
Specs side by side
| Metric | Mistral AI Codestral 25.08 | Google Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Input price (per 1M) | $0.3 | $2 |
| Output price (per 1M) | $0.9 | $12 |
| Context window | 256k tokens | 2M tokens |
| Speed tier | fast | balanced |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| EU region | Yes | Yes |
| Free tier | La Plateforme | No |
| Prompt caching | No | Yes |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Extended thinking | No | Yes |
When to choose each
Choose Codestral 25.08 if…
- Cost is a priority ($0.30 / $0.90 per 1M vs $2 / $12 per 1M)
- You need open weights for self-hosting or fine-tuning
- You want a free tier for prototyping
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro if…
- You need 2M context (8× more than Codestral 25.08)
- You need image input / vision
- Coding is central to your workload
- Reasoning is central to your workload
Benchmark delta
Codestral 25.08 leads on
Codestral 25.08 has no meaningful benchmark lead in this pair.
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads on
- Coding
- Reasoning
- General knowledge
- Long-context retrieval
- Instruction following
- Multilingual
- Tool use
FAQ — Codestral 25.08 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Codestral 25.08 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro — which is better?
Codestral 25.08 and Gemini 3.1 Pro are both current production-tier models. Codestral 25.08 is meaningfully cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per 1M. Gemini 3.1 Pro has a 2M context window — about 8× the 256k of Codestral 25.08. Gemini 3.1 Pro leads on coding, reasoning, general knowledge. The right pick depends on your use case — see "When to choose each" above for a data-driven decision.
How does Codestral 25.08 pricing compare to Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Codestral 25.08 costs $0.30 / $0.90 per 1M vs Gemini 3.1 Pro at $2 / $12 per 1M. Codestral 25.08 is cheaper on output tokens by roughly 1233%. Both support prompt caching, which reduces effective cost by 80-90% on repeat system prompts.
Does Codestral 25.08 or Gemini 3.1 Pro have the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Pro has a 2M-token context window — 8× the 256k context of Codestral 25.08. Enough for entire codebases, books, or multi-document RAG.
Is there a free tier for Codestral 25.08 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Codestral 25.08: yes — Free tier for prototyping with rate limits. Gemini 3.1 Pro: no — Paid-only since 2026-04-01 (previously had free tier via AI Studio).
Which is better for coding — Codestral 25.08 or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads on coding benchmarks (Codestral 25.08: 90/100, Gemini 3.1 Pro: 94/100). For production coding agents also weigh tool-use performance — Codestral 25.08 scores 78, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 91.