Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Kimi K3

Gemini 3.1 Pro and Kimi K3 are both current production-tier models. Gemini 3.1 Pro leads on long-context retrieval, vision.

Specs side by side

Metric
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Z.ai
Kimi K3
Input price (per 1M)$2$3
Output price (per 1M)$12$15
Context window2M tokens1.0M tokens
Speed tierbalancedbalanced
Open weightsNoNo
EU regionYesNo
Free tierNoNo
Prompt cachingYesYes
Vision inputYesYes
Extended thinkingYesYes

When to choose each

Google

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro if…

  • You need 2M context (2× more than Kimi K3)
  • EU data residency is required
  • HIPAA eligibility is required
  • Long-context retrieval is central to your workload
  • Vision is central to your workload
Z.ai

Choose Kimi K3 if…

  • Kimi K3 is in the same tier as Gemini 3.1 Pro — pick by provider preference or API ecosystem

Benchmark delta

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads on

  • Long-context retrieval
  • Vision

Kimi K3 leads on

Kimi K3 has no meaningful benchmark lead in this pair.

FAQ — Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Kimi K3

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Kimi K3 — which is better?

Gemini 3.1 Pro and Kimi K3 are both current production-tier models. Gemini 3.1 Pro leads on long-context retrieval, vision. The right pick depends on your use case — see "When to choose each" above for a data-driven decision.

How does Gemini 3.1 Pro pricing compare to Kimi K3?

Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2 / $12 per 1M vs Kimi K3 at $3 / $15 per 1M. Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper on output tokens by roughly 25%. Both support prompt caching, which reduces effective cost by 80-90% on repeat system prompts.

Does Gemini 3.1 Pro or Kimi K3 have the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Pro has a 2M-token context window — 2× the 1.0M context of Kimi K3. Enough for entire codebases, books, or multi-document RAG.

Is there a free tier for Gemini 3.1 Pro or Kimi K3?

Gemini 3.1 Pro: no — Paid-only since 2026-04-01 (previously had free tier via AI Studio). Kimi K3: no — No free API tier; kimi.com web chat is free with limits.

Which is better for coding — Gemini 3.1 Pro or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 leads on coding benchmarks (Gemini 3.1 Pro: 94/100, Kimi K3: 95/100). For production coding agents also weigh tool-use performance — Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 91, Kimi K3 scores 90.