Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-5.6 Luna are both current production-tier models. GPT-5.6 Luna is meaningfully cheaper at $1 / $6 per 1M. Gemini 3.5 Flash leads on coding, reasoning, long-context retrieval.

Specs side by side

Metric
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna
Input price (per 1M)$1.5$1
Output price (per 1M)$9$6
Context window1.0M tokens1.1M tokens
Speed tierfastfast
Open weightsNoNo
EU regionYesYes
Free tierGoogle AI StudioNo
Prompt cachingYesYes
Vision inputYesYes
Extended thinkingYesYes

When to choose each

Google Free tier

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash if…

  • You want a free tier for prototyping
  • Coding is central to your workload
  • Reasoning is central to your workload
OpenAI

Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…

  • GPT-5.6 Luna is in the same tier as Gemini 3.5 Flash — pick by provider preference or API ecosystem

Benchmark delta

Gemini 3.5 Flash leads on

  • Coding
  • Reasoning
  • Long-context retrieval
  • Multilingual
  • Vision

GPT-5.6 Luna leads on

GPT-5.6 Luna has no meaningful benchmark lead in this pair.

FAQ — Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna — which is better?

Gemini 3.5 Flash and GPT-5.6 Luna are both current production-tier models. GPT-5.6 Luna is meaningfully cheaper at $1 / $6 per 1M. Gemini 3.5 Flash leads on coding, reasoning, long-context retrieval. The right pick depends on your use case — see "When to choose each" above for a data-driven decision.

How does Gemini 3.5 Flash pricing compare to GPT-5.6 Luna?

Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.5 / $9 per 1M vs GPT-5.6 Luna at $1 / $6 per 1M. GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper on output tokens by roughly 50%. Both support prompt caching, which reduces effective cost by 80-90% on repeat system prompts.

Does Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-5.6 Luna have the bigger context window?

GPT-5.6 Luna has a 1.1M-token context window — 1× the 1.0M context of Gemini 3.5 Flash. Enough for entire codebases, books, or multi-document RAG.

Is there a free tier for Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-5.6 Luna?

Gemini 3.5 Flash: yes — Reduced daily quota via AI Studio for prototyping. GPT-5.6 Luna: no — Low-cost at $1/$6 per 1M; starter credits only.

Which is better for coding — Gemini 3.5 Flash or GPT-5.6 Luna?

Gemini 3.5 Flash leads on coding benchmarks (Gemini 3.5 Flash: 91/100, GPT-5.6 Luna: 85/100). For production coding agents also weigh tool-use performance — Gemini 3.5 Flash scores 90, GPT-5.6 Luna scores 87.